Due to recent changes in pricing and available hardware, Mediated Computer Purchasing is paused. As soon as things stabilize I will issue a new order form. This will hopefully be no longer than a week or two.If you have any questions or have an immediate need for new hardware, please open a ticket with support @ owwl.org.
Appropriate Use of Distribution Lists Communications sent through System email distribution lists must:Moving forward, please direct all emails about lost or missing materials to the circ-all distribution list. Thank you!To prevent an influx of irrelevant emails, users are prohibited from using distribution lists inappropriately. Inappropriate use of the System’s email distribution lists includes, but is not limited to:
- Be sent using an authorized OWWL Library System email address;
- Be relevant to the selected distribution list;
- Use respectful, professional, and courteous language; and
- Adhere to all privacy laws and System policies.
- Sending spam, promotional, or unsolicited messages unrelated to library or list functions;
- Sending circulation-related communication (such as missing book notices) to the OWWL Library System Mailing List instead of the circulation specific distribution list;
Audit![]() |
Key Findings | Takeaways for Libraries |
---|---|---|
Locust Valley Central School District – Information Technology Equipment Management | District officials did not maintain complete and accurate IT inventory records. As a result, officials cannot assure taxpayers that all IT equipment is safeguarded, adequately accounted for and would be detected if lost, stolen or misused. The Board of Education (Board) did not adopt a comprehensive written policy for IT equipment inventory or perform periodic physical inventories. We determined that 49 of the 72 IT assets we reviewed (68 percent) were not properly accounted for. Specifically:
|
|
Town of Plymouth – Employee Benefits | Officials did not accurately record department leave or properly pay separation payments. As a result, of the 14 employees we reviewed, officials overpaid 11 employees a total of $25,238 for one or more type of leave, as follows:
|
|
Misconceptions that Undermine Psychological Safety Psychological safety is essential for learning, innovation, and performance—but it’s often misunderstood. Here are the common misconceptions that can stall progress and erode trust—and what to focus on instead. It means being nice. Politeness shouldn’t come at the cost of honesty. When teams avoid hard truths to stay comfortable, they miss opportunities to learn and improve. Psychological safety is about permission for candor—not the absence of tension. It means getting your way. Being heard doesn’t mean being agreed with. Psychological safety ensures everyone’s ideas are welcome—not automatically accepted. The goal is better collective outcomes, not individual wins. It guarantees job security. Being able to speak up freely is a sign that psychological safety exists—but it doesn’t shield anyone from layoffs or organizational change. It simply means people can raise concerns without fear of retaliation. It requires a trade-off with performance. You don’t have to choose between excellence and openness; high standards and psychological safety are both essential. Without honest input, teams fall into groupthink and fail to adapt. It can be mandated only from the top. Policies and leadership alone can’t create psychological safety. It must be built interaction by interaction. Leaders set the tone, but every team member plays a role. Asking questions, showing interest, and responding supportively helps make it a reality. This tip is adapted from “What People Get Wrong About Psychological Safety,” by Amy C. Edmondson and Michaela J. Kerrissey.